<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for University of Michigan Students of Objectivism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://umso.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://umso.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>The University's Rational Egoists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:15:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intelligent Design vs. Evolutionary Theory: A Brief Comparison by PaulGL</title>
		<link>http://umso.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/intelligent-design-vs-evolutionary-theory-a-brief-comparison/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulGL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 14:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umso.wordpress.com/?p=27#comment-275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Absolutely correct. &#039;Creationism&#039; and its disguised makeover &#039;Intelligent Design&#039; are attempts to justify traditional, religious misconceptions which are scripturally incorrect. Anyone promoting these should see the documentary of &#039;Dover Board of Education&#039; ASAP. Fact: If the Bible is the word of God, science will validate this- not conflict. Any apparent discrepancies are due either to misconception &amp; ignorance; or to a lack of details in scripture in order to not interfere with free-will necessary to faith. Just as the &#039;Big Bang&#039; is confirmation of Genesis 1:1; there should be correlations in Genesis that are undisputedly evolutionary. For details: www.amessageforthehumanrace.org, Ch. 6.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely correct. &#8216;Creationism&#8217; and its disguised makeover &#8216;Intelligent Design&#8217; are attempts to justify traditional, religious misconceptions which are scripturally incorrect. Anyone promoting these should see the documentary of &#8216;Dover Board of Education&#8217; ASAP. Fact: If the Bible is the word of God, science will validate this- not conflict. Any apparent discrepancies are due either to misconception &amp; ignorance; or to a lack of details in scripture in order to not interfere with free-will necessary to faith. Just as the &#8216;Big Bang&#8217; is confirmation of Genesis 1:1; there should be correlations in Genesis that are undisputedly evolutionary. For details: <a href="http://www.amessageforthehumanrace.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.amessageforthehumanrace.org</a>, Ch. 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intelligent Design vs. Evolutionary Theory: A Brief Comparison by A real Biologist</title>
		<link>http://umso.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/intelligent-design-vs-evolutionary-theory-a-brief-comparison/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A real Biologist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umso.wordpress.com/?p=27#comment-274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t much care who is offended by this but I really wish we would stop calling this a debate. A debate more or less requires a somewhat workable argument from both sides. &quot;Should taxes be re-worked?&quot;, &quot;What role should America have in Israel&#039;s policies?&quot; ect ect ect. However if someone came up to me and said &quot;I&#039;m going to argue against the sperm theory of conception in favor of the stork theory.&quot; 

At this point it ceases to be a debate and more of a farce, a burlesque or at best a parody that lampoons debate. However when the maddening (and mind numbing) idiocy actually is believed by one of the two parties it looses its comical appeal. 

(un) Intelligent design has absolutely no basis beyond a highly biased speculation that is also based on ignorance. However evolution has in fact proven itself at every single turn over and over and over and over again. It yet to fail a single challenge that has been laid before it. Every experiment, every discovery and even conventional logic that is so simple that children in elementary school can understand it. All of these are tale tell signs of the right answer. 

If any scientist had a legitimate discreditation of evolution they would receive the Nobel Prize. Seeing as that hasn&#039;t happened yet Its safe to assume there isn&#039;t a single shred of evidence to the contrary despite a mass social rejection of a scientific truth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t much care who is offended by this but I really wish we would stop calling this a debate. A debate more or less requires a somewhat workable argument from both sides. &#8220;Should taxes be re-worked?&#8221;, &#8220;What role should America have in Israel&#8217;s policies?&#8221; ect ect ect. However if someone came up to me and said &#8220;I&#8217;m going to argue against the sperm theory of conception in favor of the stork theory.&#8221; </p>
<p>At this point it ceases to be a debate and more of a farce, a burlesque or at best a parody that lampoons debate. However when the maddening (and mind numbing) idiocy actually is believed by one of the two parties it looses its comical appeal. </p>
<p>(un) Intelligent design has absolutely no basis beyond a highly biased speculation that is also based on ignorance. However evolution has in fact proven itself at every single turn over and over and over and over again. It yet to fail a single challenge that has been laid before it. Every experiment, every discovery and even conventional logic that is so simple that children in elementary school can understand it. All of these are tale tell signs of the right answer. </p>
<p>If any scientist had a legitimate discreditation of evolution they would receive the Nobel Prize. Seeing as that hasn&#8217;t happened yet Its safe to assume there isn&#8217;t a single shred of evidence to the contrary despite a mass social rejection of a scientific truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intelligent Design vs. Evolutionary Theory: A Brief Comparison by Jim McCraley</title>
		<link>http://umso.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/intelligent-design-vs-evolutionary-theory-a-brief-comparison/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim McCraley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 21:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umso.wordpress.com/?p=27#comment-269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How it really happened!
Before this time began, there was no heaven, no earth and no space between. A vast dark ocean washed upon the shores of nothingness and licked the edges of the night.


A giant Cobra floated on the waters. Asleep within its endless coils lay the Lord Vishnu. He was watched over by the mighty serpent. Everything was so silent and peaceful that Vishnu slept undisturbed by dreams motion. From the depths a humming sound began to tremble, Ohm. It grew and spread, filling the emptiness and throbbing with energy.

The night had ended, Vishnu awoke. As the dawn began to break, from Vishnu&#039;s navel grew a magnificent lotus flower. In the middle of the blossom sat Vishnu&#039;s servant, Brahma. he awaited the Lord&#039;s command.

Vishnu spoke to his servant: &quot;It&#039;s time to begin&quot;, Brahma vowed. Vishnu commanded: &quot;Create the world&quot;. A wind swept the waters. Vishnu and the serpent vanished.


 
Brahma remained in the lotus flower, floating and tossing on the sea. He lifted up his arms and calmed the wind and the ocean. Then Brahma split the lotus flower into three. He stretched one part into the heavens. He made another part into the earth. with the third part of the flower he created the skies.

The earth was bare. Brahma set to work. He created grass, flowers, trees and plants of all kinds. To these he gave feeling. Next he created animals and the insects to live in the land. He made birds and many fish. To all these creatures he gave the sense of touch and smell. He gave them the power to see, hear and move. The world was soon bristling with life and the air was filled with the sound of Brahma&#039;s creation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How it really happened!<br />
Before this time began, there was no heaven, no earth and no space between. A vast dark ocean washed upon the shores of nothingness and licked the edges of the night.</p>
<p>A giant Cobra floated on the waters. Asleep within its endless coils lay the Lord Vishnu. He was watched over by the mighty serpent. Everything was so silent and peaceful that Vishnu slept undisturbed by dreams motion. From the depths a humming sound began to tremble, Ohm. It grew and spread, filling the emptiness and throbbing with energy.</p>
<p>The night had ended, Vishnu awoke. As the dawn began to break, from Vishnu&#8217;s navel grew a magnificent lotus flower. In the middle of the blossom sat Vishnu&#8217;s servant, Brahma. he awaited the Lord&#8217;s command.</p>
<p>Vishnu spoke to his servant: &#8220;It&#8217;s time to begin&#8221;, Brahma vowed. Vishnu commanded: &#8220;Create the world&#8221;. A wind swept the waters. Vishnu and the serpent vanished.</p>
<p>Brahma remained in the lotus flower, floating and tossing on the sea. He lifted up his arms and calmed the wind and the ocean. Then Brahma split the lotus flower into three. He stretched one part into the heavens. He made another part into the earth. with the third part of the flower he created the skies.</p>
<p>The earth was bare. Brahma set to work. He created grass, flowers, trees and plants of all kinds. To these he gave feeling. Next he created animals and the insects to live in the land. He made birds and many fish. To all these creatures he gave the sense of touch and smell. He gave them the power to see, hear and move. The world was soon bristling with life and the air was filled with the sound of Brahma&#8217;s creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intelligent Design vs. Evolutionary Theory: A Brief Comparison by albarrs</title>
		<link>http://umso.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/intelligent-design-vs-evolutionary-theory-a-brief-comparison/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[albarrs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umso.wordpress.com/?p=27#comment-237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moses wrote sometime within 40 years before his death in 1405 BC that Adam was made from the &quot;dust of the ground&quot; by God. Now I don&#039;t pretend to know who God was or is, but neither do you or anyone else. Remember that account was written as early as 1445 BC by Moses. At that time and for thousands of years after that date humans did not even know what chemical elements existed in the dust of the ground, nor did they know what chemical elements existed in humans, and all other life forms on Earth. It wasn&#039;t until 1868 that precursors to DNA was discovered. It was even later in the next century that we figured out that indeed Moses was right, the human body is made up of the same chemical elements as the &quot;ground&quot; as written in the Book of Genesis. It&#039;s the same chemical elements as seawater, which has been used during wartime as a substitute for human blood, and the chemical elements are the same as all other life forms on earth. This is proof that the Book of Genesis, written by Moses at the direction of God is a true and accurate history of the earth and humans. It also established a high technical and capable civilization that existed before the worldwide flood of 2345 BC. Why do I say that? Because suddenly many high technologies sprang up after 2344 BC including domestication and hybridization of plants and animals which take generations and thousands of year to accomplish. Today we are slowly discovering high tech artifacts deep in the earth which could not have gotten there by any other means but a great flood with its earth crust churning action by earth quakes, volcanoes and tidal waves that reshaped the Earth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moses wrote sometime within 40 years before his death in 1405 BC that Adam was made from the &#8220;dust of the ground&#8221; by God. Now I don&#8217;t pretend to know who God was or is, but neither do you or anyone else. Remember that account was written as early as 1445 BC by Moses. At that time and for thousands of years after that date humans did not even know what chemical elements existed in the dust of the ground, nor did they know what chemical elements existed in humans, and all other life forms on Earth. It wasn&#8217;t until 1868 that precursors to DNA was discovered. It was even later in the next century that we figured out that indeed Moses was right, the human body is made up of the same chemical elements as the &#8220;ground&#8221; as written in the Book of Genesis. It&#8217;s the same chemical elements as seawater, which has been used during wartime as a substitute for human blood, and the chemical elements are the same as all other life forms on earth. This is proof that the Book of Genesis, written by Moses at the direction of God is a true and accurate history of the earth and humans. It also established a high technical and capable civilization that existed before the worldwide flood of 2345 BC. Why do I say that? Because suddenly many high technologies sprang up after 2344 BC including domestication and hybridization of plants and animals which take generations and thousands of year to accomplish. Today we are slowly discovering high tech artifacts deep in the earth which could not have gotten there by any other means but a great flood with its earth crust churning action by earth quakes, volcanoes and tidal waves that reshaped the Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intelligent Design vs. Evolutionary Theory: A Brief Comparison by albarrs</title>
		<link>http://umso.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/intelligent-design-vs-evolutionary-theory-a-brief-comparison/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[albarrs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umso.wordpress.com/?p=27#comment-236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. or Miss. Roderick, please explain where you get your information about evidence of the evolution of one species into another different species? Where are you hiding your &quot;transitional&quot; fossils and where in nature can I find a living transitional animal if your theory is correct? Last time I checked there are none!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. or Miss. Roderick, please explain where you get your information about evidence of the evolution of one species into another different species? Where are you hiding your &#8220;transitional&#8221; fossils and where in nature can I find a living transitional animal if your theory is correct? Last time I checked there are none!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intelligent Design vs. Evolutionary Theory: A Brief Comparison by albarrs</title>
		<link>http://umso.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/intelligent-design-vs-evolutionary-theory-a-brief-comparison/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[albarrs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umso.wordpress.com/?p=27#comment-235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is clear from the first two paragraphs of this work that writer Roderick had already made up his mind about his subject before writing about it. Like many dedicated Darwin followers he or she clearly attempts to make the case for evolution at the expense of creationists. If I were still in the university system I would have to give him or her an F for his attempt to compare evolution to intelligent design. He has done both faction a disservice. The honest truth would be appreciated by many researchers, readers and writers...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is clear from the first two paragraphs of this work that writer Roderick had already made up his mind about his subject before writing about it. Like many dedicated Darwin followers he or she clearly attempts to make the case for evolution at the expense of creationists. If I were still in the university system I would have to give him or her an F for his attempt to compare evolution to intelligent design. He has done both faction a disservice. The honest truth would be appreciated by many researchers, readers and writers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intelligent Design vs. Evolutionary Theory: A Brief Comparison by benjamin</title>
		<link>http://umso.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/intelligent-design-vs-evolutionary-theory-a-brief-comparison/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[benjamin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umso.wordpress.com/?p=27#comment-223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Guys Lets all agree that Jesus is LORD, the CREATOR of all! Lets call upon HIM in everything!&quot;

no, and no.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Guys Lets all agree that Jesus is LORD, the CREATOR of all! Lets call upon HIM in everything!&#8221;</p>
<p>no, and no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intelligent Design vs. Evolutionary Theory: A Brief Comparison by Jake</title>
		<link>http://umso.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/intelligent-design-vs-evolutionary-theory-a-brief-comparison/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umso.wordpress.com/?p=27#comment-222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To &quot;bords,&quot; [sic]

Science is the unbiased pursuit of knowledge in nature - in our bodies, in our surroundings, and in our universe. It is a no-spin zone for unlocking the secrets of everything from supernovas to subatomic particles in the events of the past, present, and future. One of the primary aims of science is to help the human race. Our best chance at helping the human race is to distill and work off of the most scientifically grounded material, but that&#039;s besides my purpose. I wish to remind you that one of the key battles between evolutionary and ID theorists is whether ID should accompany, or even supplant evolution theory in the SCIENCE classroom, not the philosophy classroom. So yes, whether God or some other designer sits in the sky and has designed all that we know is a hot topic for debate in a metaphysics seminar or fundamentalist Sunday School, but it will never be a valid discussion in a Science curriculum, being taught as a core academic to children like myself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To &#8220;bords,&#8221; [sic]</p>
<p>Science is the unbiased pursuit of knowledge in nature &#8211; in our bodies, in our surroundings, and in our universe. It is a no-spin zone for unlocking the secrets of everything from supernovas to subatomic particles in the events of the past, present, and future. One of the primary aims of science is to help the human race. Our best chance at helping the human race is to distill and work off of the most scientifically grounded material, but that&#8217;s besides my purpose. I wish to remind you that one of the key battles between evolutionary and ID theorists is whether ID should accompany, or even supplant evolution theory in the SCIENCE classroom, not the philosophy classroom. So yes, whether God or some other designer sits in the sky and has designed all that we know is a hot topic for debate in a metaphysics seminar or fundamentalist Sunday School, but it will never be a valid discussion in a Science curriculum, being taught as a core academic to children like myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intelligent Design vs. Evolutionary Theory: A Brief Comparison by PaulGL</title>
		<link>http://umso.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/intelligent-design-vs-evolutionary-theory-a-brief-comparison/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulGL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umso.wordpress.com/?p=27#comment-220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without valid universally applicable (and agreed upon by all participants &amp; observers), there can be no valid derivations or conclusive parameters. You have rational uniform constructs; or you have totally individual subjective reality (Solipsism) which is inherently irrational. Please read Chapter One : The Axiom (only 2 pages long), in amessageforthehumanrace.org
This book is a cohesive, logical explanation with empirically deduced conclusions that are validated by the relevent scientific evidence and also scripturally substantiated. It encompasses virtually every field of knowledge and explains the purpose behind everything pertinent to man. Sounds grossly egotistical and ostentatious, right? Let the reader be the judge! WARNING: whereas it is pro-Christ, it is also anti-religion. FYI for the prophecy buffs: no Mayan nonsense nor Nostradamus hindsight, scientific. Cosmology: yes, probably life throughout the universe. But UFO&#039;s though real are NOT extra-terrestrial.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without valid universally applicable (and agreed upon by all participants &amp; observers), there can be no valid derivations or conclusive parameters. You have rational uniform constructs; or you have totally individual subjective reality (Solipsism) which is inherently irrational. Please read Chapter One : The Axiom (only 2 pages long), in amessageforthehumanrace.org<br />
This book is a cohesive, logical explanation with empirically deduced conclusions that are validated by the relevent scientific evidence and also scripturally substantiated. It encompasses virtually every field of knowledge and explains the purpose behind everything pertinent to man. Sounds grossly egotistical and ostentatious, right? Let the reader be the judge! WARNING: whereas it is pro-Christ, it is also anti-religion. FYI for the prophecy buffs: no Mayan nonsense nor Nostradamus hindsight, scientific. Cosmology: yes, probably life throughout the universe. But UFO&#8217;s though real are NOT extra-terrestrial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intelligent Design vs. Evolutionary Theory: A Brief Comparison by Paul Lemons</title>
		<link>http://umso.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/intelligent-design-vs-evolutionary-theory-a-brief-comparison/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Lemons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://umso.wordpress.com/?p=27#comment-219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 04:14:52 +0000 To: achristian1985@hotmail.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 04:14:52 +0000 To: <a href="mailto:achristian1985@hotmail.com">achristian1985@hotmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
